Gov. Tom Wolf’s first executive order banned gifts for executive branch employees in order to eliminate conflicts of interest between those in power and anyone “seeking to obtain business from or has financial relations with the commonwealth.”

The governor has also criticized “backroom deals” and declared, “It’s time to restore the public’s trust in our government by pushing for reforms and initiatives that increase openness and transparency.”

These are noble ideals on which we can all agree.

But during budget hearings this month, Wolf’s Budget Secretary Randy Albright repeatedly evaded questions about the status and cost of contract negotiations that will cost taxpayers about $3.4 billion, saying he was “not at liberty to discuss” the process. Even worse for transparency advocates, the beneficiaries of these contracts are some of Wolf’s largest campaign donors.

It’s true: by the end of June, Wolf is expected to settle collective-bargaining agreements with 16 state government unions, which cover more than 44,000 state employees and cost nearly $3.4 billion in 2014. How he handles the process will reveal just how closely he will stick to his word on openness, transparency and restoring the public’s trust in government.

For taxpayers, the stakes are high: unless Wolf freezes wages, salaries and health-care benefits for these public employees, billions of additional dollars will be added to the budget. Gov. Tom Corbett negotiated the same contracts in 2011 — implementing no transparency measures in the negotiation process — and granted the unions an 11 percent increase over four years.

A similar move by Wolf would boost state spending by about $380 million annually.

Given Wolf’s commitment to being “a different kind of governor,” will he make these negotiations open and transparent?

Unlike other state spending decisions, contract negotiations for state employees on pay increases, health-insurance benefits, work rules and the taxpayer-funded collection of union political money are negotiated in secret and at the sole discretion of the governor.

At the end of the process, taxpayers are presented with a bill for billions of dollars — before they’ve ever seen what they’re buying.

Complicating matters, Wolf received more than $2.6 million in campaign contributions from six of the government unions with whom he will be negotiating. Those unions are likely expecting a return on their political investment at the bargaining table.

How does Wolf square these contributions to his campaign while elsewhere touting his ban on gifts from anyone who is “seeking to obtain business from or has financial relations with the commonwealth”?

While his cabinet members must refuse a bottle of water or cup of coffee at a speaking engagement, Wolf hypocritically accepts millions from those who stand to gain billions of public dollars through his influence.

In fact, provisions in these contracts enable government unions to collect campaign contributions from their members using state payroll systems. Continuing to allow political money to be collected by the state and, almost certainly, donated to his reelection campaign would contradict any standard of ethics — especially the standards the governor has publicly set for himself.

Wolf does have options. During these negotiations, he could post collective-bargaining proposals online, provide contract cost estimates before they’re signed and even open up the talks to public scrutiny. This would help restore public confidence in the process and would prove that Wolf’s “gift ban” isn’t all bark and no bite.

Indeed, State Sen. Ryan Aument (R-Lancaster) recently introduced legislation that would require the public to be notified and able to access state and local meetings where government union contracts negotiations are held. After all, it’s taxpayers who will be paying for it all.

No one should be able to rent the apparatus of the state for their political purposes. Wolf now has a chance to demonstrate his commitment to that principle and to show true independence from his largest campaign contributors and Harrisburg’s biggest special interests.

By making negotiations transparent and ending the state collection of union dues and campaign contributions, the governor can live up to his promises of openness, transparency and accountability. That would truly be a “fresh start” in creating “a government that works.”

Matthew J. Brouillette is president and CEO of the Commonwealth Foundation (, Pennsylvania’s free market think tank.

comments powered by Disqus